There is also an increasing trend to create a diverse array coworking communities to suit different workers, and to reflect the make up of cities. Notably, there are many coworking spaces that aim to serve professional women in various formats.
In January, The New York Times apparently “discovered” this phenomena, and wrote a piece based on a few examples—from Los Angeles. Sheila Marikar did a rather ill-informed piece in the Style section about home coworking targeting women, with the annoying title, “Come on Over to My Place, Sister Girlfriend, and We’ll Co-Work” . Much of the piece is about the supposed ‘girls-hanging out’ conviviality of these work sessions.
The fluffy piece portrayed this as (a) sort of Californian craziness and (b) something that women do.
There are many ways to cowork, many different coworkers, and many different kinds of coworking communities. There are many ways that women cowork, many different female workers, and many different kinds of female-oriented coworking communities—and many not-particulary-female-oriented coworking communities with many female workers.
As I noted, this home coworking approach has a considerable history, and the actual sessions vary, depending on the preferences of the participants. That’s kind of the point, no?
It is true that home coworking is attractive to workers, male and female, who don’t enjoy a dry, soulless office environment.  Again, that’s the point.
So, to sum up: from the NYT article, we learn that some women sometimes enjoy a female-oriented, informal chatty work environment. Yup. So? The whole idea of coworking is that workers get to choose and create their own working environment. For these workers, this is what they want. (And, by the way, there have been times when I enjoyed a chatty, silly office environment–mostly male.)
While I found the article deeply and comprehensively ignorant, other were irritated by the Style-section fluffiness. Very irritated.
Liz Elam of the Global Coworking Unconference reacted sharply, bristling “We’re Not Giggling and Braiding Each Other’s Hair, We’re Building an Industry” . She found the article disrespectful, and points out that the coworking industry has had female leadership from the beginning. (Elam herself is one of those founding leaders.)
Now, Sensei Elam and I have our differences. She is dedicated to the idea of growing a global coworking industry, which I think is misguided. But I would never say Elam doesn’t know coworking inside and out.
In this case, she is absolutely right, and I don’t blame her for speaking up. The NYT article is insulting to working women, coworking or not. But it is especially insulting to the many, many female leaders, entrepreneurs and workers who have created, operate, and participate in coworking.
Marikar knows almost nothing about real coworking. It’s that simple.
- Liz Elam, We’re Not Giggling and Braiding Each Other’s Hair, We’re Building an Industry, in GCUC Blog. 2017. http://gcuc.co/were-not-giggling/
- Hoffice. Hoffice: Come and work at someone’s home. 2017, http://hoffice.nu/en/.
- Lori Kane, Tabitha Borchardt, and Bas de Baar, Reimagination Stations: Creating a Game-Changing In-Home Coworking Space, Lori Kane, 2015.
- Sheila Marikar, Come on Over to My Place, Sister Girlfriend, and We’ll Co-Work, in New York Times. 2018: New York. p. Di. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/style/quilt-coworking-women.html
- Melissa Mesku (2016) Community: the key thing. New Worker Magazine, http://newworker.co/mag/what-your-key-says-about-your-coworking-space/
What is Coworking?
Note: please stay tuned for my new ebook, “What is Coworking”, coming Real Soon Now in 2018.