Zhenyu Wen and colleagues write in IEEE Internet Computing about “Fog Orchestration for Internet of Things Service” 
Don’t you thing “Fog Orchestra” is a great name for a band?
After laughing at the unintentionally funny title, I felt obliged to read the article.
The basic topic is about the “Internet of Things”, which are “sensors, devices, and compute resources within fog computing infrastructures” (, p. 16) As Arieff quipped, this might be called “The Internet of Too Many Things”.
Whether this is a distinct or new technology or architecture is debatable, but the current term or art, “fog computing” is, for once, apt. It’s kind of like Cloud Computing, only more dispersed and less organized.
Wen and colleagues are interested in how to coordinate this decentralized fog, especially, how to get things done by combining lots of these little pieces of mist. Their approach is to create a virtual (i.e., imaginary) centralized control, and use it to indirectly control pieces of the fog. Basically, the fog and its challenges is hidden by their system, giving people and applications a simpler view and straight forward ways to make things happen. Ideally, this gives the best of both worlds, the flexibility and adaptability of fog, and the pragmatic usability of a monolithic application.
(Pedantic aside: almost anything that is called “virtual” something, such as “virtual memory” or a “virtual machine” or a “virtual private network”, is usually solving this general problem. The “virtual” something is creating a simpler, apparently centralized, view for programmers and people, a view that hides the messy complexity of the underlying system.
Pedantic aside aside: An exception to this rule is “Virtual Reality”, which is “virtual” in a totally different way.)
The authors summarize the key challenges, which include:
- scale and complexity
- fault detection ans handling
This list is pretty much the list of engineering challenges for all computing systems, but solving them in “the fog” is especially challenging because it is loosely connected and decentralized. I.e., it’s so darn foggy.
On the other hand, the fog has some interesting properties. The components of the system can be sprinkled around wherever you want them, and interconnected in many ways. In fact, the configuration can change and adapt, to optimize or recover from problems. The trick, of course, is to be able to effectively use this flexibility.
The researchers refer to this process as “orchestration”, which uses feedback on performance to optimize placement and communication of components. They various forms of envision machine learning to automatically optimize the huge numbers of variables and to advise human operators. This isn’t trivial, because the system is running and the world is changing even as the optimization is computed.
I note that this general approach has been applied to optimizing large scale systems for a long time. Designing networks and chips, optimizing large databases, and scheduling multiprocessors use these kinds of optimization. The “fog” brings the additional challenges of a leap in scale, and a need for continuous optimization of a running system.
This is a useful article, and has a great title!
- Zhenyu Wen, Zhenyu, Renyu Yang, Peter Garraghan, Tao Lin, Jie Xu, and Michael Rovatsos, Fog Orchestration for Internet of Things Services. IEEE Internet Computing, 21 (2):16-24, 2017. https://www.computer.org/internet-computing/2017/05/05/fog-orchestration-for-internet-of-things-services/