Category Archives: History

Cold War Tech Wizardry

James Bond and his Hollywood brethren are absurd, comic book characters.  Most of the stories make no sense and have no connection to actual events.

The exception, of course, is Bond’s tech.  If anything, the real history of Cold War espionage is even crazier than the Hollywood version.

As a technologist, I can only look back in wonder at the sheer daring.  My father’s generation mobilized the economies of whole continents; rolled up their sleeves, and built impossible things.  With a slide rule, soldering iron, and plywood!

All bow to the mighty ones! We are not worthy!

This winter, IEEE Spectrum reposted a wonderful article from retiring Sensei Robert W. Lucky, about an infamous and astonishing bit of technical espionage from the Cold War [1]. 

Back in the day, the US and Russia were locked in a deadly Spy vs. Spy contest around the world.  One of the hotspots was the US Embassy in Moscow, which was a certainly nest of spies and absolutely a prime target for Russian intelligence. 

For many years it was believed that the whole place was bugged, but counterintelligence couldn’t find anything.

Eventually, the US collected everything electrical (ten tons!) and sent it home for analysis.  (Presumably, this was transported in a “diplomatic bag”! : – ) )

Technicians dismantled, examined, and x-rayed everything.  Which turned out to be necessary to find the bug. 

What they found was an astonishing bit of technical sneakiness. 

Younger readers will not really understand how amazing this hack was, because they won’t know what an IBM Selectric electric typewriter was (look it up).  This was very much an analog technology, with wires levers and motors.  No software at all.

Nevertheless, the (unknown) Russian techies bugged it; collecting key strokes and transmitting them later.

Collecting analog key strokes. 

The hack included a hollowed out piece of the aluminum frame with special tiny circuit boards and magnetometers inside.  The magnetometers sensed the motions of tiny magnets embedded in the mechanism that moved the typing ball, to detect what letters were typed. Other parts apparently worked as batteries and antennas.

Wow!

The data was returned in a low powered burst of radio.  This was never detected by the US because it was obfuscated by broadcast TV signals.  But somehow, the low powered data signal could be filtered out of the much more powerful obfuscating signal. 

Wow!

It is recounted that, once this system was grokked, the investigator was amazed, but also felt “a kinship with the Soviet engineers who had designed this ingenious system.” [1]

As Lucky puts it, “This is the same kinship I feel whenever I come across some particularly innovative design, whether by a colleague or competitor. It is the moment when a technology transcends known limits, when the impossible becomes the doable.” [1]

And how!


  1. Robert W. Lucky, The Crazy Story of How Soviet Russia Bugged an American Embassy’s Typewriters, in IEEE Spectrum, December 30, 2019. https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-crazy-story-of-how-soviet-russia-bugged-an-american-embassys-typewriters

Shane Greenstein on “Ten Open Questions for Techno-Optimists”.

Robert Gordon’s Rise and Fall of American Growth describes how economists grapple with the economic impacts of new technologies. Gordon’s history reviews aspects of the last 150 years, as technology transformed the US economy, explaining the challenges of accounting for what can be incomparable technologies.  Just how much did the replacement of horses with internal combustion engines improve life?  What was the economic value of the telephone?  And so on.

At the end of his survey, as “Growth” enters its “Fall”, he points out the open questions about the impact of recent technical changes, especially digital computing and networking. In particular, the IT revolution of the last two decades does not appear to have produced a rise in productivity. Is this due to inability to measure the economic impact, or have these technologies truly had so little economic consequences?

Shane Greenstein elaborates on this question with “Ten Open Questions for Techno-Optimists”. <<link>> The title refers to economists who are inclined to believe that technological advances are, indeed, improving productivity, growth, and quality of life, i.e., they are “optimists” about technology. Greenstein’s ten questions are, essentially, an more detailed unpacking of Gordon’s general point.

The list is quite interesting and provocative. For example, “How Much Productivity Does Email Produce?” (!) We all use it, it has displaced many paper based forms of communication; it is undeniably a “successful” technology.  Surely it is extremely significant economically and in other ways.  But, Greenstein points out, “Nobody ever paid a licensing fee to make use of this invention.” ([1], p. 86). How much does email contribute to GDP?

His other questions are equally provocative.

  • Why are Online Pictures and Videos Everywhere Except in the Productivity Statistics?
  • What Were the Gains from Reduction in Search Costs?
  • What Were the Gains from Making the Long Tail Available?
  • Up-to-Date Online News is Additive. Is it Productive, Too?
  • Did the Rise of Remote Work Change Productivity?
  • How Much Did Wikipedia Benefit the Economy?
  • Enterprises do not Own All Their it. Does that Mean they are More Productive?
  • How Big were the Gains from Serving Low-Density Areas?
  • What is the Value of the Creative Commons License?

Phew!

I like this article because I always like to read good ideas for great thesis topics. Wouldn’t it be cool to have an estimate of the societal value (and cost) of Creative Commons or Wikipedia?  We have a new verb, “to google”, but just how valuable is the action it labels?

I also enjoyed this list because my own career contributed to the underpinnings of many of these technologies. It’s quite a list, and it puts a different perspective on all those years we spent just “messing around with computers”. Gosh.

You’re welcome.

By the way, his question “Did the Rise of Remote Work Change Productivity?” is about the rise of telecommuting, remote collaboration, distributed work teams, and also coworking. The latter topic is considered in some detail in my forthcoming ebook, “What is Coworking?”, coming in early 2017.


  1. Shane Greenstein, Ten Open Questions for Techno-Optimists. IEEE Micro, 36 (4):86-87, 2016.

A. Lincoln Still Important

It’s Abraham Lincoln’s birthday, how could I forget!? He lived here, and somehow is still relevant today.

A favorite Lincoln anecdote:

A friend of mine, a new immigrant from China, was studying to become a US citizen. He told me he went to the local library and asked if they had some history books to help him study. (Oh, yes, yes we do!! This is what public libraries were created to do!!)

He told me how amazing George Washington was, winning independence, leading the country, and then returning to private life. (Imagine how different China might be, had Mao stepped down after 8 years.)

I happened to be reading about Abe Lincoln at the time, so I commented, that Washington was cool, and wait until you get to Lincoln.

Then he surprised me:  he told me that he already know about Lincoln.  They teach about him in schools, even out in rural villages in China!

I guess, if you liberate a people, they will teach you everywhere. Nice.

This made me consider what Abe would think about Chine, as well as the waves of immigrants to America from all over Asia and the Americas.

I’m pretty sure he’d be way into it, and absolutely fascinated by China and India and all “the South”.  And I’m pretty darn sure he’d favor legalizing immigration, for goodness sake.  This is America, he’d say. Come on in. Welcome.

 

Books to Note (Ancient History Department): Imagining the Past

I enjoy reading fact-based imagining of the past. Dry academic history may be important, and historical fiction can be fun, but I really like a good job in between these extremes.  What do the sources really say and mean?  We can only imagine what the people thought and experienced.  But we can create well-informed imaginings.

Here are some good examples, recent and older, all on the theme of “ancient history” in the Mediterranean.

A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponesian War by Victor Davis Hanson (New York, Random House, 2005)

The topic is the Peloponesian War, a thirty year war between the Athenian Empire and a Spartan led coalition, which ultimately involved neighbors, and ended in the destruction of Athens and exhaustion of the whole region.

Popular history has portrayed this war in various simple pictures, often reflecting contemporary anxieties and big power geopolitics.  Land Power versus Sea Power, Authoritarian/Totalitarian versus “Democracy”, etc.  This book is obviously influenced by contemporary anxieties and recent history, which has given us a dark, pessimistic, and skeptical view of warfare.

This was a truly horrendous war, with vast unintended consequences, grim ironies, and, as we have grown to expect, no real purpose or winner.  There were endless, pointless atrocities on all sides, and quite a few “cunning plans”.  Athens, relying on essentially invulnerable city walls to frustrate Spartan invasions, was ravaged by plague. “Democratic” Athens attacked just-as-democratic Syracuse, and losing the whole expedition (and how was invading Sicily a good idea, with the Spartan army besieging the city of Athens?).

Let’s add slave rebellions in Sparta, colonial rebellions in the Athenian Empire.  Savage, merciless, and costly sieges. Massacres of civilians and prisoners.  Ethnic cleansing.  A right wing coup in besieged Athens, followed by counter coup, with hundreds of political killings.  Mercenaries, pirates, guerillas, Persian intervention, generals and whole cities switching sides.

In the end, nothing could ever be the same. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

You could sum up everything with the quote from the book:  “Worse folly ensued.” (p. 216)

Helen of Troy: Goddess, Princess, Whore by Bettany Hughes (New York, Alfred E. Knopft, 2005).

In yet another fine book, BH considers Helen of Troy; a real woman, literary character, goddess, and cultural icon.  She follows Helen as told by Homer and lesser known literature, as well as traces at archaeological sites across the Greek world.  She also follows Helen across centuries, one of the few women never to be written out of history.

Helen is universally known as a symbol of beauty.  A runaway Spartan queen and Trojan princess, Homer has her cursed by the gods, and makes her responsible for the war and the ultimate destruction of Troy.  Throughout the ages, her memory has been worshiped and damned, she is imagined to be, as the subtitle indicates, “goddess, princess, whore”.

Hughes gives us a lively consideration of the known facts, spiced with first hand visits to the actual sites which can be found.  She reconstructs as much as is possible what the real Helen would have been, and how she would have lived.  She also reconstructs many of the ancient versions of Helen’s myth, in Sparta, Athens, and the Mediterranean.

The Hemlock Cup: Socrates, Athens and the Search for the Good Life by Bettany Hughes (New York, Alfred E. Knopf, 2011)

In a second book, Hughes reconstructs an enigmatic man, Socrates.  Despite his fame and pivotal importance in Western thought, little is known about Socrates. We have many simple versions of a rational, rebellious, “truth teller”, who dies a martyrs death. But that story never really made sense, and, of course, the reality is murkier.

Hughes reconstructs Athens of the time, and what we know of Socrates, his life, and how he fit (or didn’t) in Athens.  The book gives flesh to the legend, with plenty of detail about real life in Athens, which is both familiar and alien to us.

The drama of his trial and execution can only be understood in the context of war-time Athens, and the aftermath of military catastrophe’s and a rightist putsch (see also Hanson, above).  Furthermore, we struggle to imagine the reality of Athenian democracy, in which you could be tried and executed, literally, by public opinion.

Mystery Religions in the Ancient World by Joscelyn Godwin (San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1981)

Popular history gives us a shallow and distorted view of ancient religion, which is often portrayed as a monolithic, systematic creed (Zeus, Apollo, Venus, and all).  Or sometimes we are treated to stories of imagined “ancient knowledge” and “ancient mysteries”, projecting contemporary anxieties and fashions onto entirely fictional beliefs.

In fact, “[t]he people of the Roman Empire enjoyed a freedom of choice in religious matters unparalleled until modern times.” (p.7)  These were living traditions, experienced by people in all segments of society.  A catalog of “sects”, gods, and occult practices does not really tell us much about what these meant to their adherents.  As he says, “I do not want to learn about Platonism from a logical positivist, but from a Platonist.” (p. 8) To do this requires “a deliberate effort of the imagination is necessary in order to comprehend them.” (p. 8)

This book is one of his efforts to bridge these centuries with a serious, fact-based, imaginative examination of the “mystery cults” of the Roman Empire.  Chapters cover the familiar Imperial Cult, various folk beliefs, cults of Mithras, Cybele, Isis, Orpheus, and Dionysius; Judaism, Gnosticism, Christianity, and various syntheses.

The emphasis is on practices, “hidden knowledge”, and how the various threads might influence each other.  I was particularly fascinated by his interpretation of some otherwise inscrutable archaeological evidence, suggesting important religious uses of certain sites, uses which have been lost to history.

It is also interesting to consider Christianity at this formative period when it was a small, upcoming religion with a lot of competition.  I leave it to contemporary believers to parse out any significance in the exchanges and relations among these cults.

Pagans And Christians by Robin Lane Fox (New York : Knopf, 1987)

RLF focuses on the third century AD (as we now reckon the calendar), a period during which the Pagan Cults and Christianity existed side-by-side in the Roman Empire.  The transition of the Roman Empire from officially Pagan to official Christian is a well-known event, but it was the culmination of centuries of conflict and coexistence which is difficult for us to comprehend today.  The simple picture of and instant of epiphany simply does not tell us what this competition meant to people of that time.

This book takes an extended look at life during this period, and how various believers viewed their own and others’ beliefs. How did Christians view the secular and Pagan environment they inhabited?  Why did Christianity provoke such intense and violent attacks from Pagans, while other, equally radical, religions were quietly tolerated? And most poignantly, how did individuals navigate this complex landscape of religion, politics, and culture?

As in Godwin’s book above, we are treated to a more complete picture of a complex, sophisticated, and diverse era.  For contemporary believers, there is much to learn about the roots of current religions, and perhaps some lessons about tolerance and the fruits of intolerance.

A Great Day to Celebrate: the 150th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation

Today is the 150th anniversary of the effective date US Emancipation Proclamation, the second most important day in the history of the US, after only July 4 1776.

Like the July 4 declaration, the Proclamation. was not the complete solution, the 13th Amendment and 1964 Civil Rights Act had be done, and much more, as well.  Like everything worthwhile, it has been hard. But the Proclamation was the hinge, the point of no return.

Emancipation had been happening haphazardly as the war progressed, though no one was completely sure how to do it, or what to do with the freed people, or what the goal was. Deportation out of the country?  Separate races?  A multiracial republic?

Almost no one could believe that full citizenship for all would be the result, but after the Proclamation. the arc of history was bending that way.

There has long been discussions of the motivation and consequences of the EP.  Certainly, the motives were complex, and there were many effects besides the obvious liberation of the enslaved people.  If the war was a struggle against slavery, there was little chance that young Queen Vicky would let Britain side with the Confederacy.  At a time when he could use every soldier he could find, Mr. Lincoln gained hundreds of thousands of black troops who would fight on forever, and follow him into the gates of Hell if he required.  And, most of all, ending slavery was necessary to make the horror, death, and destruction worth it.  We had to make a finish to it, or the cost could never be justified.

So, let’s all celebrate this day, a day we should all be proud.

I retell the story of a friend who, immigrating from China, was studying for citizenship.  Much of US history was new to him, including George Washington.  But he knew about Abraham Lincoln, from his lessons in school, in China, during the cultural revolution.  It’s not that hard to do, all you have to do is free a people, and they will teach you in every village on the planet.

It is nice to see a Hollywood movie that actually portrays this historic occasion.  I haven’t seen Spielberg’s “Lincoln”, though I have see lots of commentary. People are actually arguing about real American history, and vital, essential American history at that.  It’s a bloody miracle. For that alone, “Bravo, Mr. S.”

Senator George McGovern–Peace to you

Senator George McGovern died today. Rest in peace, friend.  You did your time.

McGovern is remembered for his crushing defeat in 1972 by Richard Nixon.

What should be recalled is that he was the real deal, honest and straightforward. They don’t make them like that anymore.

He carried the banner for the anti-war movement that year, but that understates his role.  if the government and leadership of the country had been acting remotely sensibly, there wouldn’t have needed to be such a movement.  Someone had to do something, and he was there.

Personally, I am proud to have been on the campaign staff of “citizens for McGovern” (only weeks past my 18th birthday).  Hey, we carried my own home precinct. And remember–we took on Richard Nixon, the toughest, nastiest, hombre ever to inhabit the White House.

If you think politics are crazy today, you should have seen the Nixon years. Aside from the astonishingly criminal Nixon campaign (look it up–try “Watergate”), the Democratic party was shredded and convulsed (as the racist south shifted to the republicans–look it up). McGovern himself was picked and jeered by “anti-war protesters” (I never understood that one, I assumed it was CREEP agents, but who knows).  Crazy stuff.

At one point late in the campaign, Sen. McGovern called a heckler over and whispered in his ear (allegedly), “Kiss My A**”.  That became our informal slogan.  I wish I had saved my “KMA” button. Sometimes, that is all there is to say.

Let’s all try to be a bit more like George McGovern.  Don’t yell. Tell the truth. Fight for what is right.  Never give up.

Peace, George.